ELNG 200- Self Assessment
ELNG 200 E-Portfolio Self-Assessment Rubric
Criteria | Unsatisfactory 1 | Emerging 2 | Proficient 3 | Exemplary 4 | Rating |
1. Selection of Artifacts | My artifacts and work samples do not relate to the purpose of the eportfolio. | Some of my artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio. | Most artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio. | All artifacts and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio. A wide variety of artifacts is included. | 3 |
2. Descriptive Text | No artifacts are accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of the item including title, author, and date. | Some of my artifacts are accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of the item including title, author, and date. | Most of my artifacts are accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of the item work including title, author, and date. | All artifacts are accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of the item including title, author, and date. | 3 |
3. Reflective Commentary | My reflections do not explain growth or include goals for continued learning. | A few of my reflections explain growth and include goals for continued learning. | Most of my reflections explain growth and include goals for continued learning. | All reflections clearly explain how the artifact demonstrates your growth, competencies, accomplishments, and include goals for continued learning (long and short term). | 3 |
My reflections do not illustrate the ability to effectively critique work or provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives. | A few of my reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives. | Most of my reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives. | All reflections illustrate the ability to effectively critique work and provide suggestions for constructive practical alternatives. | ||
4. Usability and Accessibility:Text Elements, Layout, and Color | The eportfolio is difficult to read due to inappropriate use of fonts, type size for headings, sub-headings and text and font styles (italic, bold, underline). | The portfolio is often difficult to read due to inappropriate use of fonts and type size for headings, sub-headings, text or long paragraphs. | The eportfolio is generally easy to read. Fonts and type size vary appropriately for headings, sub-headings and text. | The eportfolio is easy to read. Fonts and type size vary appropriately for headings, sub-headings and text. | 4 |
Horizontal and vertical white space alignment are used inappro-priately, and the content appears disorganized and cluttered. | Horizontal and vertical white space alignment are sometimes used inappro-priately to organize content. | Horizontal and vertical white space alignment are generally used appropriately to organize content. | Horizontal and vertical white space alignment are used appropriately to organize content. | ||
Color of background, fonts, and links decrease the readability of the text, are distracting and used inconsistently throughout the eportfolio. | Color of background, fonts, and links generally enhance the read-ability of the text, and are generally used consistently throughout the eportfolio. | Color of background, fonts, and links generally enhance the read-ability of the text, and are generally used consistently throughout the eportfolio. | Color of background, fonts, and links enhance the readability and aesthetic quality, and are used consistently throughout the eportfolio. | ||
5. Writing Conventions | There are more than six errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling requiring major editing and revision. | There are four or more errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling requiring editing and revision. | There are a few errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. These require minor editing and revision. | There are no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. | 3 |
TOTAL(out of 20) | 16 |
Comments:
Reasons why I gave myself 16/20 for my self assessment.
- My eportfolio is very organized and easy to find certain assignments. I have made headings for each assignment for this class and have submitted each assignment on time.
- I have hit most of the expectations for each assignment that the assignment descriptions asked for. I wrote about the readings and videos we watched and read throughout the course and about my own personal experience as well.