Summary of Learning – EC&I 834: Designing for Online and Blended Learning

As I wrap up my journey in EC&I 834 in my Summary of Learning,  I am filled with a deep sense of accomplishment, growth, and gratitude. This course has been a transformative experience both professionally and personally. What started as a curiosity about designing online learning has become a confident foundation in creating purposeful, engaging, and inclusive digital learning environments.

Throughout this course, I explored new dimensions of pedagogy, instructional design, and educational technology. One of the most impactful aspects was learning how to apply the ADDIE model Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation to create a full course prototype. My project focused on building a blended professional development program for teachers on Effective Classroom Instruction. It was challenging but incredibly rewarding to develop modules that addressed real needs, integrated meaningful assessment strategies, and leveraged digital tools like Google Classroom.

This process helped me think deeply about access, flexibility, and equity. I became more aware of the barriers some learners face whether it’s limited internet access, lack of devices, or competing responsibilities and intentionally worked to design a course that is accessible and culturally responsive. These considerations will stay with me as I continue to design for diverse learners.

One of my proudest moments was seeing how the modules came together in a cohesive, learner-friendly format. The feedback from peers helped me refine my ideas and reinforced the power of community in online spaces. I also appreciated the reflective nature of our assignments and discussions, which pushed me to think critically about how technology supports not replaces good teaching.

While I’ve gained confidence in many areas, I recognize that there’s always more to learn. I hope to continue exploring Universal Design for Learning (UDL), mobile-first design, and strategies for building stronger student-to-student interaction in asynchronous environments. The learning never really ends.

As I say farewell to EC&I 834, I want to express my heartfelt thanks to Dr. Hildebrandt  and all my classmates. Your insights, encouragement, and openness created a welcoming environment where I felt safe to take creative risks and grow as an educator. This course has not only enhanced my skills it has reaffirmed my passion for teaching and designing learning experiences that truly make a difference. It doesn’t end here! I will improve on this prototype and it will definitely be used in real settings for teacher’s training.

Thank you all, and best wishes as we continue our learning journeys.

Pheeewww! I did it! Here is the screen cast walkthrough of the final course prototype.

Designing this course prototype on Effective Classroom Instruction has been both insightful and rewarding. The process required a thoughtful blend of instructional design theory and practical knowledge about teachers’ everyday classroom experiences. Using the ADDIE model—Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation—provided a structured approach that ensured the course stayed focused, relevant, and responsive to the real needs of educators.

1. Deepening Understanding of Teachers’ Needs

In the Analysis phase, developing personas like Emma (new teacher), James (mid-career), and Sophia (veteran) helped me better empathize with the diverse teaching backgrounds and challenges. It clarified the importance of differentiating support and using inclusive strategies for professional development.

2. Designing for Engagement and Practicality

The Design and Development phases challenged me to think creatively about how to engage adult learners. I found it particularly meaningful to include elements like scenario-based learning, peer feedback, and reflective journals—methods that align with adult learning theory and promote real-world application. Mapping course-level objectives with practical assessments (like micro-teaching, video submissions, and classroom reflections) ensured that the learning remained authentic and job-embedded.

3. Integrating Technology Thoughtfully

Implementing the course using Google Classroom and integrating tools like Google Forms pushed me to consider access and equity. I became more intentional about low-bandwidth options, asynchronous participation, and designing content that accommodates diverse socioeconomic contexts, especially important in many educational settings.

4. Building Meaningful Assessments

Creating formative and summative assessments like self-assessments, peer evaluations, and lesson plan submissions encouraged me to think beyond grades and focus on growth. Teachers benefit more from reflective and performance-based assessments that mirror their classroom realities.

5. Facing and Solving Real-World Constraints

One of the most valuable parts of the experience was anticipating and addressing common concerns, like limited tech access, teacher burnout, and inconsistent attendance. These challenges reminded me that any effective teacher training must be flexible, inclusive, and adaptive to changing classroom contexts.

Overall Takeaway

Building this course prototype has helped me sharpen my skills in instructional design, adult learning, and educational technology. It reinforced the need for contextualized, flexible learning experiences that respect teachers’ time, experience, and professional goals. I now feel more confident in designing and facilitating meaningful professional learning that teachers can actually use—and want to use—in their classrooms.

The review of my course prototype highlights several strengths, including its well-structured content, engaging synchronous activities, and clear course profile. However, among other shortcomings like absence of clear instructions and description of course flow, an essential area for improvement is the accessibility of the course for students with disabilities. Alas! this didn’t even cross my mind. While the course appears to be generally user-friendly, there are additional considerations that can enhance inclusivity and ensure that all students, regardless of their abilities, can fully participate in the learning experience which were totally left out. These are the things I would consider moving forward.

Navigation and Layout

For students with cognitive disabilities, dyslexia, or attention disorders, an alternative way to present the course materials, such as a structured table of contents or a visual roadmap, could be beneficial. Additionally, ensuring compatibility with screen readers and offering text-to-speech functionalities would support visually impaired students.

Multimodal Engagement and Accessibility Features

The use of interactive videos and discussion posts is commendable, but more accessibility features could be incorporated. For instance:

• Captions and Transcripts: While the videos are captioned, it is crucial to ensure that all multimedia content includes accurate captions and transcripts. Providing downloadable transcripts would also be helpful for students who prefer reading over watching videos.
• Audio Descriptions: If visual elements are used to convey important information in videos, audio descriptions should be added to make the content accessible to visually impaired students.
• Alternative Text for Images: If future modules incorporate images for more engagement, alternative text descriptions should be included for screen reader users.

Interactive Components and Assistive Technology Compatibility

The course encourages interaction through class comments and discussion posts, which is an excellent way to foster engagement. However, it is essential to ensure that these interactive features are compatible with assistive technologies. For example, students using screen readers should be able to navigate and engage in discussions without difficulty. Additionally, interactive videos should allow keyboard navigation to accommodate students who may not be able to use a mouse.

Assessment and Feedback Mechanisms

The immediate feedback provided in quizzes is a strong feature, but accessibility considerations should be incorporated into the assessment design:

• Alternative Quiz Formats: Offering multiple ways to complete assessments, such as verbal responses or text-based alternatives, could benefit students with motor disabilities or learning difficulties.
• Extended Time Options: Ensuring that students who require additional time due to disabilities can adjust quiz timers or request accommodations would make the course more inclusive.
• Clear and Concise Instructions: Instructions should be written in plain language and formatted for easy readability, with the option to listen to them using screen reader software.

Blended Learning and Inclusivity

The blended format of the course is well-suited to diverse learners, but it is crucial to ensure that students with disabilities can fully engage in both synchronous and asynchronous activities.

• Accessible Live Sessions: Synchronous sessions should include real-time captioning and sign language interpretation when needed.
• Flexible Participation Options: Providing alternative ways for students to participate, such as discussion boards or recorded lectures, ensures that those with hearing impairments, mobility issues, or time constraints can still engage effectively.

Conclusion

By integrating these accessibility enhancements, the course can become more inclusive and ensure that all students, regardless of their abilities, can fully engage with and benefit from the content. Implementing universal design principles in future modules will not only accommodate students with disabilities but also enhance the learning experience for all participants.

As I explore the use of H5P for designing training programs, I am intrigued by its potential to enhance engagement through interactive videos. Although I have limited direct experience with H5P, I recognize its value in creating a more immersive learning environment for teachers.

First Impressions and Expectations

Before working with H5P, I primarily viewed instructional videos as passive learning tools. However, the ability to embed interactive elements, such as quizzes, clickable links, and reflection prompts, makes H5P a promising tool for active learning. I anticipate that integrating these elements into training programs can help teachers engage more deeply with the content, improving retention and application in their classrooms.

Challenges and Learning Curve

While experimenting with H5P, I found that designing interactive content requires careful planning. One challenge is ensuring that the interactivity aligns with the learning objectives rather than becoming a distraction. Additionally, for teachers who are not tech-savvy, there might be a learning curve in navigating H5P features. This highlights the need for initial guidance or training before full implementation.

Potential Impact on Teacher Training

I believe that incorporating H5P into blended learning programs can offer significant benefits. For instance, teachers can engage with pre-recorded lessons at their own pace and test their understanding through embedded questions. This format not only personalizes learning but also provides trainers with valuable insights into teachers’ progress and areas where additional support is needed.

Future Considerations

Moving forward, I aim to explore how H5P can be effectively integrated into my own instructional design. I would like to test different interactive elements to determine which are most effective for engaging teachers. Additionally, gathering feedback from users will be essential to refine the content and address any technical challenges.

Overall, while I am still in the early stages of using H5P, I see its potential as a powerful tool for teacher training. By thoughtfully integrating interactive videos into professional development programs, we can create a more dynamic and effective learning experience.

Blended learning is a powerful approach that combines the best aspects of both in-person and online learning. It offers flexibility, personalized learning, and increased engagement while still maintaining the benefits of face-to-face interactions.

From an adult education and workforce development perspective (which I am interested in), blended learning is particularly valuable. It allows working professionals to balance their education with job responsibilities, offers opportunities for self-paced learning, and facilitates practical, real-world applications of concepts. Many organizations use blended learning for human resource development (HRD) initiatives, ensuring employees have access to continuous professional development without disrupting workflow.

However, successful blended learning depends on thoughtful instructional design—simply combining online and offline elements isn’t enough. There must be clear integration between the two, ensuring that digital resources support in-person learning and vice versa. Access to technology and digital literacy can also be barriers, particularly in developing contexts like Nigeria, where infrastructure and internet access may vary.

With my recent experience and study, blended learning in HRD is a game-changer because it makes training more flexible, scalable, and cost-effective. Companies can mix online modules with in-person workshops to reinforce learning while minimizing time away from work. This is especially useful for leadership development, technical skills training, and compliance programs.

For personal learning, blended learning allows for self-paced study while still benefiting from live discussions, mentorship, and networking. You get the best of both worlds—structured guidance and the freedom to explore concepts deeper on your own.

Course Overview and Description: 

As a school owner and administrator for over a decade, I have trained teachers and have desired to design a more comprehensive and organized instructional course kit for teachers. This course EC&I 834 on Designing for Online and Blended Learning offers me the opportunity to learn to achieve this. This informed my choice of course topic and content in this assignment. Using the ADDIE template , I have been able to create a course profile to guide instruction.

Target Staff Population and Demographics This course is designed for K-12 educators across various experience levels, including:

• New Teachers (Ages 22-30):Recently certified educators with limited classroom experience.
• Mid-Career Educators (Ages 30-45):Teachers with 5-10 years of experience looking to refine their teaching strategies and integrate technology.
• Veteran Teachers (Ages 45+):Educators with over a decade of experience seeking innovative approaches and updated methodologies.

Participants will come from diverse educational backgrounds and varying technological proficiencies. The course will cater to both primary and secondary school educators.

Course Format

• Blended Learning Approach: A mix of online and optional in-person components.
• Synchronous and Asynchronous Elements:
  • Weekly live Zoom sessions (synchronous) for discussions and peer collaboration.
  • Pre-recorded lectures and self-paced modules (asynchronous) for flexibility.
• Duration:6-8 weeks, with an estimated time commitment of 3-5 hours per week.

Course Toolset

• Platform: Google Classroom (LMS for content delivery, discussion, and assignments).
• Instructional Tools:
  • Pre-recorded video lectures and interactive case studies.
  • Micro-teaching simulations for real-world practice.
• Communication Tools:
  • Zoom (live sessions and breakout rooms for collaborative discussions).
  • Discord (peer networking and support forum).
• Assessment Tools:
  • Kahoot (interactive quizzes and formative assessment).
  • Flipgrid (video reflections and peer feedback).
  • Google Drive (submission of lesson plans and portfolio work).

Course Content and Learning Objectives The course will focus on five key themes:

Module 1: Fundamentals of Effective Classroom Instruction: Engagement strategies, lesson planning, and student motivation.

Module 2: Classroom Management Strategies: Techniques for behavior management and fostering a positive classroom culture.

Module 3: Differentiated Instruction: Strategies for addressing diverse learning needs.

Module 4: Educational Technology Integration: Tools and best practices for digital learning environments.

Module 5: Assessment and Feedback: Effective formative and summative evaluation techniques.

Learning Objectives: By the end of this course, learners will be able to:

1. Apply effective classroom instruction techniques to enhance student engagement.
2. Implement classroom management strategies to support a productive learning environment.
3. Design differentiated instruction plans to address student diversity.
4. Utilize digital tools for lesson delivery and student assessment.
5. Develop and apply both formative and summative assessment techniques.

Assessment Strategies

• Formative Assessments:
  • Online quizzes and reflection journals.
  • Peer feedback on micro-teaching sessions.
• Summative Assessments:
  • Recorded teaching demonstrations with self-evaluation.
  • A final project consisting of a comprehensive lesson plan and instructional strategy presentation.

Considerations for Common Concerns

• Low Bandwidth Issues:
  • Course materials available in downloadable PDF and video transcript formats.
  • Asynchronous content allows flexible access without requiring real-time participation.
• Device Accessibility:
  • Mobile-friendly platform compatibility for teachers using smartphones.
  • Alternative assignment formats for those with limited technology.
• Attendance Concerns:
  • Recorded sessions available for later viewing.
  • Participation through discussion forums for those unable to attend live.
• Cultural Considerations:
  • Inclusive course design with culturally relevant examples and case studies.
  • Flexibility in assignments to accommodate diverse teaching contexts.
• Socioeconomic Factors:
  • Free access to essential course resources.
  • No high-cost technology requirements; emphasis on widely available tools.

Rationale for Course Prototype Design This course balances accessibility, flexibility, and interactivity to cater to teachers from varied backgrounds. The blended format provides the structure of synchronous engagement while allowing for self-paced learning. The chosen technology tools ensure easy access without demanding high-bandwidth or costly devices. A strong emphasis on practical application and peer collaboration ensures that teachers can immediately implement learned strategies in their classrooms. The course aligns with best practices in professional development by promoting active learning, reflective practice, and continuous improvement in instructional techniques.

Welcome to Education Sites. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!