“Feedback is the compass for greatness; it tells you what to avoid, what to learn, and where to excel.”  – Henrik Ceder, Netigate

Creating my first module using the Google platform was a good experience for me. Even though I am familiar with Google Classroom, I have never used it as an LMS where I need to inculcate a lot of materials and design. The feedback received really showed that I did put a lot of effort into what I’ve done, and I still need to improve on my module design. Based on the feedback, I will be modifying my prototype and course shell in the following areas.

1. User Experience and Enhancement

One of the feedbacks received is the need to provide direct links to specific sections of textbooks and activities to streamline content access. This idea is actually welcomed; however, my intention for integrating the whole textbook was because learners will be using the same textbook as their reading source for the whole course. Nevertheless, I recognize the importance of making content navigation as seamless as possible. I will update the course materials by embedding direct links to specific textbook sections and relevant activities, ensuring that students can access the required content without unnecessary searching. This will enhance efficiency and minimize potential learning barriers.

During the review process, I revisited the course shell and realized a problem with the Padlet I integrated. Even though this was later identified by the reviewers, I already corrected the settings to enhance user experience in posting responses.

Another concern raised was the issue of the navigation challenge and pinning the initial course message in the Google Classroom “Stream” page to ensure easy access. One major problem is that “pinning is not a feature in Google Classroom. However, one thing I think I will try doing is to ensure that important messages or posts are moved to the top of the “stream page.” This will give access to visitors to easily read instructions that would help them navigate to the “classwork” tab.

There was also an issue around the lack of clear labeling for accessing and timing of synchronous sessions that need to be addressed. I acknowledge that this was an oversight because instructions and information regarding this were given in the video presentation before integrating it under the welcome section. However, I will create a separate label to indicate clear information about the synchronous session. This section will also include explicit information on the modality state and estimated weekly time commitment (as indicated in the profile and course shell)

2. Content Organization

The feedback also focused on resource clarity and learning outcomes. Though I had indicated the learning outcomes in the beginning of the presentation slide. Based on the feedback received, I guess the learning outcomes should have a visible section in the course shell so that it can be easily seen by everybody and provide clearer expectations for students. A big misunderstanding was also the fact that the module is covered within a week, and all subtopics addressed in the module were already integrated into the presentation “Notes and resources” section. Even though this appeared as a mismatched title to the reviews, I will have to include a clear instruction on what has been embedded in this section so as not to create confusion for students.

It was also indicated that the course profile does not explicitly detail policies or strategies for addressing attendance concerns. Even though the importance of attendance in the module was implied in the scheduled Zoom meetings and live quizzes. Hence, I will outline attendance policies and also provide options for students who may miss synchronous sessions, such as recorded lectures or alternative assignments in the course profile.

3. Engagement and Interaction

I integrated a discussion board into my course module. However, it is suggested that an introductory post from me (the instructor) could help initiate discussions and promote engagement. This will be taken into consideration in my next module, since it is considered a way of modeling interactive behavior to encourage student engagement in forums.

In the quiz design, one of the reviewers suggested the use of the H5P module for fill-in-the-blank exercises to enhance interactivity and engagement. I used H5P in some aspects of the quiz, and I also used a feedback mechanism through the Google quiz. I also thought to include a traditional set of questions in the module so that students could reflect and provide answers. This was done intentionally so that in case students had to do the quiz in the live class, it would give me the opportunity to discuss the answers with them. The suggestions will be considered when designing my second module. I will also be including feedback for wrong and correct answers with explanations in the Google quiz as suggested by one of the reviewers. This would help students understand their mistakes and learn from them.

4. Inclusivity and accessibility

Concerns around providing additional language support for EAL students, as well as low bandwidth and student access to devices, were raised. To address these concerns, I already included links to free open resources that are downloadable for students’ use. I also included presentation slides and videos that students can download with limited internet resources and use offline. I will also be providing additional language support resources to enhance understanding of the course, particularly for EAL learners.