Each September, all staff and students of my division are required to sign an Acceptable Use of Technology Agreement. The agreement is vast in covering what technology is, privacy and tracing, and access to the division network. The agreement is in part to protect the division:
“Inappropriate use of the Technology may expose the school division to legal liability and/or public embarrassment. The objective of this administrative application is to balance employee and student ability to fully benefit from informative technology against the school division’s need to ensure that all use of the Technology meets the school division’s legal obligations and upholds the Division’s reputation and public image.”
It also lays out the consequences of not using technology appropriately, including discipline in the form of loss of access to technology use, legal action, and financial responsibility.
This agreement is very consequence based. This is what we expect you to do, and if you don’t this is what can happen. It is important to note the consequences. Ultimately, the division needs to protect itself, perception wise, legally, and financially. But there is not much mention of what students should be doing. Teachers need to focus on teaching responsibility in the classroom – here is what we want you to do when using technology. Similar to the positive behavior program we use at our school, we want to catch and reward students for doing the right things.
I wonder what our division’s policy would look like if it were rewritten in a responsibility format. Does anyone have examples of what this looks like in your schools/divisions?
Last year we had a launch that looked neat in the deck but fell apart the moment teams had to actually work together — legal blocking things, product delaying, marketing pushing too early. We kept losing people right at the start and couldn’t figure out why. At some point I came across a few ideas here and it was fixing the order of how users meet the product. We stopped forcing actions upfront, cleaned up the first steps, and suddenly people just… stayed. Onboarding stopped bleeding and activity picked up without us throwing more budget at it. Managed to improve my business without becoming a drama king.