As a middle years teacher, I don’t think my opinion on this topic will change anytime soon. I believe the use of technology in the classroom is both important and relevant, especially given the expectations placed on us by the division. Like I mentioned during the debate, it’s not just about using tech, it’s about how, why, and when we use it. I don’t think technology needs to be used every day or in every scenario, but it does open up a lot of possibilities for teaching and learning.
In my initial post, I mentioned tools like IXL, EDSBY, Word, OneNote, Teams, PowerPoint, Canva, Sway, and others. These can be used meaningfully in day-to-day teaching. Tech helps speed up lessons (when Wi-Fi is working) and often makes things more efficient than traditional pencil-and-paper tasks.
That said, I also see the flip side. Some teachers lean too heavily on technology, using it more to keep students occupied than for true learning. I get it, teaching today comes with big challenges: larger class sizes, mixed grades, and a wider range of student needs. Technology is convenient because it allows students to work at their own pace and keeps them engaged. The following images taken from the pro side of the debate’s article list just goes to show why teachers try and utilize technology as much as possible.
But I do wonder about fairness and consistency. Some students have ROAs that require the use of technology all the time, which helps them access the curriculum, but is it also holding them back from developing basic skills like printing, drawing, or writing by hand?
Sure, those things can now be done digitally too, but will students still develop the fine motor skills they may need later in life? Or is that no longer as relevant in today’s world?
From a parent’s perspective, I’ve seen the impact both ways. My child once had a teacher who didn’t “believe in” using computers, so even though his ROA required it, he rarely got the access he needed. That year was a real struggle. Tools like Word, the calculator app, and Google Translate made a huge difference in helping him learn and stay engaged. Without access to those, he was lost. In previous years, having access to a computer when needed helped him stay on track and fully engage, especially as he was learning a second language.
Still, one of the strongest points from the opposing side was about how distracting technology can be, and I totally agree. I see it every day. Even with close monitoring, it’s nearly impossible to catch everything. Students can be off-task so quickly playing games, chatting on Teams, or browsing off-topic sites. Yes, I can check in and monitor their activity, but let’s be honest, who has the time to do that constantly with 30+ students? The author of this article states that students “need to learn more effective self-control techniques to keep them focused on the learning at hand.” I agree with the point, but it’s just one more thing teachers are expected to teach even though there’s already not enough time in the day as it is.
At the end of the day, I believe technology really does enhance learning, but it has to be used alongside traditional tools like paper and pen. Too much of anything isn’t good. Like most things in education, it comes down to balance. Moderation, flexibility, and thoughtful planning are key to making tech work with us, not against us.
‘Blended learning’ brings computers into classrooms
Have a great evening everyone!