ECS 203 Blog Post #4

Provide a brief summary of your understanding of the three learning theories introduced in the readings (behaviourism, cognitivism, and constructivism). How can you connect these learning theories with the models of curriculum (product, process, and praxis in particular) that we have discussed? What learning theories did you see reflected in your own school experiences?

Teaching and learning happen in many ways and are dependent on beliefs and assumptions one has about knowledge, expectations, and perception. Behaviourism is the learning theory of human behaviour in mental and physical aspects that can be directly observed and measured. This is quite a straightforward theory in the sense that rules and expectations should be clear and followed between both students and teachers. A reward-punishment system is implemented within the classrooms with the goal of driving students to respect the rules and strive for excellence. Cognitivism is the theory of application. The focus is that students are to take what they learn in the classroom, use their critical thinking skills, and apply it to their work or daily life in a way that works individually for students. In addition, students and teachers work together to find the best learning solutions for both parties to be successful. This theory is constantly in effect and is heavily influenced by the development of the brain.; it works to take previous knowledge and deepens it or perhaps to change it to develop a better understanding of something. Constructivism is the theory that focuses less on rules and regulations, but more on individuality and free will. This theory emphasizes how external perspectives, experiences, and engagements can construct new knowledge and understandings for students. Challenging students to engage with other students to build relationships, find similarities and differences, and problem-solve with one another is important.

I believe the Behaviorism Theory is related to the Curriculum as a Product model as it is strict and controlled. This model is the formulation of behavioral objectives-providing a clear notion of outcome so that content and method may be organized and the results evaluated (Mark. K Smith, 2000. Pg 4). Students are told what they must learn and how they are supposed to do it. The Cognitivism Theory is related to the Curriculum as a Process model as it is ongoing and constantly evolving. This model focuses on teacher and student cooperation and interactions to build students’ problem-solving abilities, focus, and individual development within the classroom. The Constructivism Theory is related to the Curriculum as a Praxis model as it is focuses on more than just work-based learning, but social and environmental learning. This is heavily impacted by the interactions between the students within a classroom. Teachers are to observe how they work together, what are the strengths and weaknesses present, or what stands out.

In school, I experienced all these theories in different ways. When I was in the twelfth grade, the majority of my schooling was behavioural theory-based. I was to listen to the teacher during lessons, work quietly at my desk, and remain on task until all my work was completed. I knew that speaking out was disrespectful and would frustrate my teacher. I needed to pay attention or else I would not be able to complete my work. In my earlier years of high school, I experienced the cognitivism-based theory. This was the time when I was learning new things and starting to build off my previous understandings. I was introduced to new subjects and styles of teaching that differed from elementary. At first, it was hard to adjust to the change, but with time and help from my teachers, I was able to adapt and improve my problem-solving skills to be successful. In elementary school, the constructivism theory was in full effect. I constantly had interactions with my peers in group projects, clubs, or reading buddies with younger students. A good portion of my marks in school at this time were based on how well I managed within the classroom. This related to the way I got along with other students, my classroom behaviour, and my group-work abilities. From what I gathered, each theory is important and implemented in the classroom, especially in relation to the ages and grade levels of the students.