Rewind to the year 1993. Picture a bubble screen tv that weighs a hundred pounds, and a glitchy video screen. My parents, confused to what they problem could be, pacing, wondering if the TV is a goner. The real problem: dust in the Nintendo. The solution: eject the game, blow some air across it and wiggle it back into position. Ta-Da! Mario is back to life and I am once again a happy camper. My father, confused to what has just happened and why that worked.
Fast forward to 2023. Last weekend, my mother and father are looking for a recipe card that cannot be found. Open Chat GPT and ask for the recipe. Ta-Da! We have a recipe and instructions. My parents, the same confused look.
Jump to my classroom today and a Chromebook that is acting weird because someone had messed around with some of the settings. Now it’s my turn to look puzzled, until a student walks up, types in a shortcut and fixes it just like that.
Technology is changing at such a rapid pace, that I find myself quite often not being able to keep up with these changes. Yet alone how my parents generation must feel, unless you are immersed in using it daily, it can be quite overwhelming. David White discusses the idea of being a visitor or a resident in our technological driven society.
In my use of technology, I flow between the two. I often am a visitor, looking for quick answers or solutions to problems. Parts of my life I use the internet and social media more as a resident, sharing information with friends and colleagues. I can clearly dictate when and how I am using my time, and how my social media and internet usage affects me. Do I enjoy hearing positive comments and seeing likes on my pictures, sure, who doesn’t. Am I putting everything of my life online to be liked or commented on, of course not. For me, teaching my students the line between residents and visitors is important. What is the reason for their online presence? And how does it alter their moods or change their relationships?
“Every generation is Generation Me, as every generation of younger people are more narcissistic than their elders.”
Brooke Lea Foster makes some interesting observations about Generation Me. The use of technology, and the craziness of social media, has made people develop a push themselves in your face way of living their lives. Everything is documented and bragged about. The residents of the internet don’t look for 15 seconds of fame anymore, they want you to heart or like every single post. My feeling is, yes it is over the top, but if this technology was available 15 years ago, then it would of happened then as well. It is just easier for our current generation to do so.
Where to now?
AI is the future. I don’t quite have my head wrapped around it yet, but the evolution of it is happening so fast. Ethan Mollick’s article does a fantastic job in summarizing the true results that AI can provide in the workplace. “Consultants using AI finished 12.2% more tasks on average, completed tasks 25.1% more quickly, and produced 40% higher quality results than those without.” That’s pretty incredible stats. The study also found that it levelled the performance of staff, with weaker staff members showing large amounts of growth in their work, and stronger staff showing smaller performance increases. In their studies though they found one very large issue though with people relying on AI, it makes users “became lazy, careless, and less skilled in their own judgment.” So begs the question, how are we going to be able to properly educate our students to use AI properly for its proper use? Where does this fall in the curriculum to be taught and how?
My REAL worry is we have this technology available now but soon will it become only available to those who can afford access? Then equity will become an even bigger issue than it currently is. Do you see AI becoming more privatized?
Hi Graeme,
Your blog post made me laugh this morning, as I still have an N64 that requires some old-school cleaning occasionally. You are right; technology is always changing and evolving, so I often find myself choosing whether to be a resident or a visitor depending on its current implications in my life. Canva? Resident. Coding? Visitor from a far-off land.
Since I work with predominately low-income and Indigenous student populations, I can already begin to see the equity problems surrounding AI. The use of AI is not allowed at my institution until further education, training, and policies are put into place. However, AI is already starting to turn to a subscription-based service, which could mean that students miss out on the wild west of free generative AI, and I already have begun to wonder what the implications of this might be.
Canva- foreign land for me, although I did manage to get through one project last year. AI I feel is just going to push the gap larger between users. Ones who understand how to use it correctly and have the proper tools and resources will flourish. Those who don’t will fall further behind, and that’s not before taking into account connectivity issues too. It is quite a large problem I feel in today’s schools.
Graeme,
I appreciate your anecdotes about Nintendo and the generational gap that has appeared over and over again as technology has developed and changed. This reminded me of when my student had to explain snap chat and the filters that came with the app– I was completely confused by what they were saying and they in turn thought it was pretty funny that I had yet to enter the world of SnapChat or really most other forms of social media (at least not actively). With that in mind, I suppose I would say I am generally a visitor when it comes to new technologies, though I am trying to engage more with different applications and technological developments.
Equitable access to technology is something that I along with my colleagues have grappled with for some time, especially after Covid and realizing that many of our students didn’t have reliable internet at home and did not have access to devices that would function beyond the scope of texting/calling while at home showed some flaws in our growing dependence on technology. This lack of service, coupled with technology companies applying subscriptions to range of services, including AI, hold the potential to increase these gaps in equitable access for many youth.
Covid definitely showed many schools that the gap in equity with technology is huge. With new services, evolution of AI, and just the ever changing landscape of educational technologies, I think this gap will surely increase. Thanks for the comment!
Graeme… Just blow on it and stick it back in the console, you probably do not need to wiggle the cord! I too was a resident of the Nintendo era. I too had the same problem with my OG Nintendo. I too had the same confused parents. I too have days where some kid walks up and presses a button and makes all of the problems that I have spent minutes trying to solve. Great article and it made me realize that through every era of Nintendo, gaming systems, and technology today we as teachers continue to figure out a way to continue to teach students!