Every action we do on the internet leaves a digital trail, which in certain situations may follow us for the rest of our lives. A frustrated post or a mistake from years ago may reappear and impact relationships, employment prospects, and college admissions. This raises the question: Should people be able to remove specific elements of their digital history?

Answering this question involves a delicate balance between personal responsibility and the right to control one’s own digital narrative. While it is important to recognize the potential harm caused by the permanence of digital footprints, there also needs to be an understanding that erasing certain aspects of digital history could undermine transparency and accountability.

Nathan Jurgenson (2012) argues that our digital lives are an extension of our real lives, challenging the idea that the internet is a distinct universe. He criticizes the propensity to view online behavior as “less real,” even when it has long-term repercussions. The “right to be forgotten” is a legal notion that permits anyone to request that outdated or harmful online information be removed. This is in keeping with the debate around this idea. Protecting people’s freedom to create their digital identities ought to be a fundamental right if we agree with Jurgenson’s contention that digital environments are inextricably linked to real life.

Jason Ohler urges students to be proactive and accountable in their online contacts, emphasizing that ethical decision-making should be at the heart of digital citizenship. His argument emphasizes the need for students to exercise critical thinking before participating in online accountability initiatives or disclosing personal information, which is particularly pertinent when thinking about issues like cyber-vigilantism and digital footprints. Ohler’s viewpoint supports the notion that digital behavior has long-term effects, highlighting the significance of incorporating conversations about digital ethics into regular education rather than teaching them as stand-alone subjects. By integrating this mindset, educators can help students develop a responsible and reflective approach to their digital presence, ensuring they understand both their rights, such as the ability to control aspects of their digital history, and their responsibilities as online participants.

To deepen our understanding of digital footprints and the ethical implications of managing our online presence, the video by Kaspersky: What is Digital Footprint and How to Protect It. It explains the concept of a digital footprint, how it’s created, and offers practical tips for protecting personal information online. It ties in well with the discussions on digital ethics, the importance of protecting one’s online identity, and the broader conversation on the right.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, as we continue to navigate the digital world, it is vital to recognize that online actions have far-reaching implications. While individuals should have the right to manage and remove harmful aspects of their digital footprints, this right must be balanced with the need for accountability and transparency. Digital ethics should be incorporated into everyday education to help individuals understand their rights, responsibilities, and the potential consequences of their online actions. Ultimately, fostering a balanced approach to digital citizenship can ensure that individuals can navigate the complexities of the digital world with integrity and responsibility.