Tyler’s rationale has had a huge impact on the majority of my education. In particular in elementary and high school. It seemed throughout elementary and high school majority of teachers had set-in-stone curriculums and that’s what we were supposed to learn by the end of the year. Tyler’s theory was based on the product and what the outcome is going to be and how to achieve the correct product. To achieve the goal of us learning everything all teachers went through the objectives, content, teaching, and learning, and evaluating us as explained in “Curriculum Theory and Practice”. Throughout my education, it seemed like teachers were frequently pressed for time to complete the curriculum before the end of the year, but many of the things on the curriculum that we “needed” to learn were not what we should have been taught because some of it wasn’t applicable to our daily lives. Throughout my education, tests constituted the majority of the evaluations. As education progresses, I’ve seen that more teachers seem to be moving away from examinations and concentrating more on assessment items like projects or papers. This has changed, in my opinion, as a result of Tyler’s justification, according to which Tyler believed that when teachers stated their objectives in terms of modifying student behaviour, it helped them change the curriculum. Teachers now feel less of a need to test due to the change in the curriculum and they develop more of an understanding of their students. Teachers are starting to realize that exams or tests do not always show if children understand the material being taught whereas a project or written paper can.
Tyler’s theory offers several drawbacks that make things impossible as well as many potential advantages that open up possibilities. This rationale can be negative due to every student having to go through the same process. Nowadays some students have a variety of learning difficulties and some children need a different way to learn. Some students won’t be successful in this way of teaching. As explained in “Curriculum Theory and Practice” the pedagogy in the classrooms is being undermined by the curriculum, which has an impact on what teachers do in the classroom. Smith also explains that sometimes teachers can take the wrong approach to teach something that is in the curriculum. The way they connected some of the theories and curriculum to real-world situations struck me throughout the reading of “Curriculum Theory and Practice”. For example; the curriculum is kind of like a shopping list when all the items are ticked, the person has passed the course or has learned something” (pg.5). Some positive attributions that Tyler’s theory brings forward is that it sets out a clear plan for the developmental process and the proper order of the process so students gain the best understanding of what is being taught. Since the value-neutral method can be applied to all subjects, it is another way it can be a good procedure.