In this post, I will compare self stories shared by classmates on the topic of Class, Socio-economic status, intersectionality, and meritocracy.
I) NORMATIVE NARRATIVES
I found similar normative narratives to my own blog post, Self Story #3: Shiny and NEW, in Annissa’s post. In Self Story #3, Annissa describes a time in her childhood where she fell in love with a ballet skirt but had to settle on a less expensive one that she disliked. Years later, when she was selling her old dance things, a young girl had the same reaction to this old skirt as she had with the brand new one and it made her feel shameful knowing that something she didn’t think was good enough was all that this girl could hope for. I also saw commonalities in Kelsey’s blog post, Writing the Self 3: Breakfast, as she describes having breakfast on her first day back to school. She fills up on a hearty breakfast and rushes off to school in her new outfit, wishing there was whipped cream for her waffles and that she hadn’t eaten so much. She is puzzled by the idea that her friend has breakfast in school. I can relate to both of these stories, as I also didn’t always have the opportunity to have new or expensive things like my friends in school, and I wasn’t always grateful in the moment for what I had. In my blog post, I describe receiving an old car in high school that I wished was new and looking back now, I realize that even though it maybe wasn’t as nice as I had imagined, it was more than enough, and certainly more than others could have had.
The common normative narrative in all of these stories is that we believed that everyone had the same opportunities and therefore, it was assumed that we would have the same things as others. We thought that this was the way it was for everyone, as if there is a level playing field. We also all had the class privilege of knowing our basic needs would be met. We didn’t have to worry about where the next meal comes from or if there will be a warm place to sleep at night. We all had material items, were involved in extracurricular activities, and had supportive families around us, that not everyone has. These stories support the idea of meritocracy where we believe that everyone succeeds on their own effort, or merit and no one has more advantage than anyone else.
One last common thread between the three stories is the gender roles played out by our mothers as caregivers in each of our homes. In Annissa’s story, her mother is taking her shopping, in my story, my mother is doing household chores, and in Kelsey’s story, her mother has shopped for her and is cooking her breakfast.
II) CREATING COUNTER-STORIES: DISRUPTING THE NORMATIVE NARRATIVE
Jean Luc’s story counteracts the normative narrative that working or middle class is the norm. In his story Status in Society, he describes two different ends of the class system. First, he explains his luxury sales clients that “spend more in one an hour than I make in a month, and can afford to”. These people represent another normative narrative that upper-middle class people have more money than brains. On the other side of the coin, Jean Luc also discusses his interaction with a lower class man living in poverty. He was a homeless man, sleeping in the recycling bin behind the shop, and never knew where the next meal would come from. This story helps to disrupt the normative narrative that middle class, materialistic life was the norm or even an option for all. This allows us to see a different perspective. In comparison to the above stories that are all working or middle class who are unsatisfied with what they have, this shows that not everyone is on the same playing field, there are things in society that keep the poor trapped within that class. In Chelsea Vowel’s The Level Playing Field Myth post, she explains “There is no ‘level playing field’ when it comes to the access of equal rights. Not for Indigenous peoples, and not even within the wider Canadian public. A host of barriers exist, preventing millions of Canadians from accessing the same rights and resources as other Canadians” (2014).
Linda Tirado explains in her essay, “We know that the very act of being poor guarantees that we will never not be poor. It doesn’t give us much reason to improve ourselves. We don’t apply for jobs because we know we can’t afford to look nice enough to hold them” (2017). This allows us to debunk the common misconception about class, which is that “anyone who wants a job can get one” (Sensoy & DiAngelo, p.170). This man does not have a home, address, shower, or means of transportation So there are many challenges that he would have to overcome before being hired for a job.
Finally, this story also disrupts the narrative that lower class people are uncultured or uncivilized. Jean Luc describes his performance as “a rhythmic tempo that was reminiscent of thunder. Then a melody layered in like rain”. Contrary to the belief that you must be high class to be cultured, this man is talented and musical and lives his life dedicated to his art.
References
Sensoy, Ö, & DiAngelo, R.J. (2017). Is everyone really equal?: An Introduction to Key Concepts in Social Justice Education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Tirado, L. (2017, December 6). This Is Why Poor People’s Bad Decisions Make Perfect Sense. Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-poor-peoples-bad-decisions-make-perfect-sense_b_4326233
Vowel, C. (2014, July 9). The Level Playing Field Myth. Retrieved from https://apihtawikosisan.com/2014/07/the-level-playing-field-myth/