Remixing or “copy catting” is everywhere. As the video Everything is a Remix proved, our world is largely built off of others ideas. I was a little bit surprised to see just how much of the music and television world was dominated by remixing a few ideas. I always look at remixing from a sports perspective because that is what I have an extensive background in. Sports people hear this all the time with team sports, “it’s a copycat league”. This is very true and people accept this and expect it to a certain extent. In sports it is anticipated, that if someone develops a system that seems to work, whether that is an offensive, defensive, or special teams system, eventually other teams will adopt the same system. I just finished developing a practice plan for my daughters hockey practice tonight. In that plan I have some original drills that I developed and I have many that I have borrowed from other coaches I know or some that I don’t but are available to me through a drill sharing website. What is not anticipated by people in sports is that teams would secretly film other teams practices or deflate footballs, to name a few things.
I couldn’t decide which one I liked more so I decided both would really drive home the point.
So how does this relate to education? I think it depends what lens you view remixing through. Through my experience as a teacher I have found that most teachers and willing to share their content. Now this also allows them to pick and choose what they want to share. I have also encountered situations where teachers find out that their content has been shared with others without their permission and they are upset about it. So like I said, I think it really depends the lens you view this through.
I am personally a big fan of collaboration in education for a number of reasons. I think that by collaborating we can develop stronger assessments and teaching tools for our students. I also think that each of us has our strengths and weaknesses and by collaborating we can eliminate those weakness by using other peoples strengths. Another aspect is that sometimes we just feel like we need to change things up so it is nice to see what other teachers are doing for the same outcomes. You may come back to your own content after trying it but it might give you some ideas of how you might be able to tweak something to improve it. Lastly, from a high school perspective I don’t think it is a bad thing to have similar assessments throughout your school and maybe even on a bigger scale. I don’t think it needs to be mandated by any means but I know that some students go into university more prepared than others and as teachers we should be trying to narrow that gap.
As a fan of collaboration I think it is important to understand that collaboration is much different than stealing. When collaborating you might be copying the person you are working with, but they know you are doing it and are willingly letting it happen. Stealing or copying without knowledge is different. Very similar to my sports examples, if it is being offered to you it is ok, but if you are being sneaky about it then I think it is wrong. Just ask!
Then there is the grey area. This is the area where you provide some of your content for a colleague and then they take it and pretend it is their own. Early in my career I had a teacher at another school reach out to me regarding an assignment for a certain outcome. I shared what I had been doing, no problem. This teacher then took it and used the lesson, promoting the lesson on social media. Superintendents were commenting on the lesson and how great it looked etc. Nowhere in the comments was there an acknowledgement of where the lesson came from but he just acted as it was his own. That was annoying.
I am torn on the impact of AI. On one hand, if I had used Chatgpt for this it would be written much better, would be wittier, would have been done a half hour ago, and it would probably be half the length. On the other hand, I go back to, do we know where it is coming from? AI develops their content from all kinds of already developed content but we don’t know where that is coming from. If we don’t know the source is it stealing? I think ultimately it is a tool that can help teachers and at this point with AI being new, it might be up to each teacher to use their own moral compass when determining if AI is a useful tool for them.