A Change in Perspective

woman using smartphone on staircase in public areas, During leisure time. The concept of using the phone is essential in everyday life.Prior to this debate, I firmly believed that cell phones should be banned in the classroom. However, after considering the arguments presented during the debates and reviewing literature on both perspectives, I have reconsidered my position and no longer view an absolute ban as necessary.  A balanced approach is required for topics such as this. Discussions regarding these issues should involve educators, parents, and government representatives, rather than being determined solely by governmental authorities.

I had not previously understood the ways in which teachers incorporate cell phones as educational tools. After listening to the debate, I now recognize that implementing an outright ban could pose challenges for educators who rely on this resource in their classrooms.  This issue presents multiple complexities, with no straightforward solution that addresses all perspectives. The lack of explicit guidelines for implementing no cell phone policies, as well as cases where teachers are responsible for confiscated phones, adds further complications.  An aspect, that was brought up in the debate I had not consider is the potential impact of regulating cell phone use on student-teacher relationships.

A notable comment is the suggestion to prohibit cell phone use among staff due to reported issues. This highlights the importance of educating individuals about developing healthy relationships with cell phones.  In the article, Phones and Focus: How To Win The Uphill Battle Of Workplace Distraction, they discuss how 720 hours are lost because of employees being distracted, and smartphones are one of the top distractions. The article also mentions that the average person checks their phone approximately 150 times in a day.  This is an astounding amount of time lost to distraction.

Office employee looking at stack of documents lying on table. Concept of overload and paperwork.The article also addresses the concept that multi-tasking is a myth, a notion with which many individuals may identify.  Many individuals experience feelings of overwhelm and burnout due to extensive technology usage and the constant challenge of disconnecting from work responsibilities.  Rapid technological advancements have outpaced our ability to adapt effectively. As a result, individuals have not sufficiently developed the skills necessary to engage with technology in a balanced and healthy manner.  This skill must be taught not only to the current generation but also to those responsible for educating them.

I really appreciate how in the article, Character Education for the Digital Age they discuss this idea of one or two lives perspective.  The two lives perspective suggests that children keep their digital experiences outside of school separate from their classroom activities. In contrast, the one life perspective involves integrating technology with schools and educators working to help students understand its impact on their lives.  Jason Ohler the author of the article states, “we must help our digital kids balance the individual empowerment of digital technology use with a sense of personal, community, and global citizens who use technology not only effectively and creatively, but also responsibility and wisely.”

He then discusses the need for character education programs tailored to digital environments and youth.  It is essential to integrate relevant topics, like digital skills, into school curricula, enabling students to develop the skills necessary to navigate these issues within the context of their own lives, as well as providing teachers with training to effectively deliver this type of instruction.  Sadi stated in her argument that the focus should be on regulating, not prohibiting, cell phones in the classroom.  Rather than banning cell phones due to concerns like  bullying that may affect academic performance,  schools should work with students to teach them healthy and responsible ways of using technology.

Policies and procedures memo written on notebook with fountain penAs we have seen in most of the debates, there are valid arguments supporting both perspectives. Therefore, adopting a balanced approach to cell phone use in the classroom may prove to be the most effective solution.  In the workplace, employees are expected to arrive on time and complete their tasks, responsible cell phones usage is another one of those expectations.  Many workplaces require employees to sign technology policies, and there are typically consequences for not adhering to company policies. This further emphasizes the importance of educating students on the responsible use of technology, including cell phones.

3 Comments

  1. Leanne Meili

    Hi Jenna,
    Thank you for sharing your insights! It was really interesting to learn how your perspective changed after the debate. My perspective on cell phones changed at the start of this past school year. I went from teaching at a school where every student had a device to one where I had to book carts or labs. Many times, cell phones became necessary in my classroom, and it was up to me to monitor and manage usage. Navigating technology use in the classroom is a constant balancing act and like you I do not believe that an absolute ban is necessary.
    Your research and data on workplace distractions was staggering and really highlights that cell phones are not just an issue in classrooms but a challenge in all workplaces! With employees checking their phones an average of 150 times per day and 720 hours lost to distractions, it really raises serious concerns about employee productivity. I found it especially interesting that many workplaces have employees sign technology policies and face consequences if they don’t follow them. I am curious about what these policies include and what consequences are enforced. Just curious……Does your workplace have a policy?

    If cell phone use is something I choose or need to incorporate in my classroom, I would make sure to clearly outline expectations and consequences in my course outline, just like I would for any other classroom rule. These expectations would need to be explained, monitored, and reinforced consistently. By integrating cell phone use this way, I would be embracing the “one life perspective” you mentioned in your blog, bringing students’ digital lives into their education. Since technology is not going anywhere, the question becomes: do we fight it, ban it, or accept that it plays a major role in our students’ lives? I agree with you, Jenna, that a balanced approach is definitely the way to go.

    Great post, Jenna! Very informative!

    • Jenna Reimer-Jones

      Hi Leanne,

      Our organization currently requires employees to sign a computer and email/internet use agreement. However, we do not have a specific policy addressing cell phone usage. Employees require access to their phones for Microsoft Authenticator, so an outright ban would be impossible. While technology should not control every aspect of our lives, it provides significant benefits. From a safety standpoint, having a cell phone while driving on rural roads, especially in winter, can be useful. I find it beneficial to have access to my cell phone when commuting between our various locations.

      Jenna

  2. Sarada Dhakal

    Hi Jenna,
    I used to think banning cell phones in the classroom was the best solution. But after the debate, I see it’s not so simple. Now I too believe that guidelines on use of cellphones in classroom is the best solution.
    I hadn’t really considered how some teachers rely on phones as a tool, especially in classrooms without computers or other technology. In those cases, banning phones might do more harm than good.
    What really stood out to me was how you mentioned distractions. I’ve seen that firsthand how students hide their phones, using them during class, even after being warned or punished. It’s clear that phones are such a big part of their lives now that simply banning them doesn’t work.
    We live in an age where dependence on mobile phones is everywhere, not just for students, but for all of us. That’s why I completely agree with your point about teaching responsible use. Students need guidance, not just rules. This is the age of mobile phones, and the truth is, it’s more about how to use them, when to use them, and where to use them. Teaching students that kind of balance is way more effective than just saying “no phones allowed. . If we help them build healthy tech habits, we’re setting them up better for the future.
    Sarada

Leave a Reply to Leanne Meili Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2025 Jenna's ePortfolio

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑