Focus on the Opportunity
Can online social media activism be meaningful and worthwhile? Is it possible to have productive conversations about social justice online? What is our responsibility as educators to model active citizenship online?
The questions posed to us this week can spark opinionated debate, passive conversation, or intellectual exchange. Every person has the choice and the right to choose how they take part in social activism. I for one do not feel comfortable getting wrapped up in conversations or debates online, especially if I do not know the other party or if I have not explored the topic to the depth of my comfort level. If participating in social media activism is a passion for someone, I do feel we can have productive conversations online and a positive media presence. Being an active, strong, positive digital citizen has to be modeled for others. We already see too much negative content and absolute trash out there, but this can be a teaching tool to ignite positive conversations in classrooms about creating a positive digital identity as children, teenagers, and adults. Educating our youth to be voices of change is very important, but I feel they need role models, platforms that are respected, and tools that can assist them in positive participation.
Social activism has many faces, and I found this model developed by Bill Moyer that breaks down 4 main types of social activism:
So now in thinking back to all that I have learned in school and throughout my life, watching ‘active’ movements and campaigns, this role chart makes sense. I find it difficult at times, to see how these roles can translate to an online platform, but they do. In fact, I discover more of the ‘rebel’ online because it may be easier to oppose or display information to suit needs, without being out in the open. Hiding behind technology to place problems from a personal needs perspective into the spotlight is cowardly. Gaining online support for your cause is great, but then what? When you have too many opposing voices and no action taken, what is the point other than the ‘feeling’ like you are contributing to a cause?
One celebrity that I follow on Instagram is Amy Schumer. Her activism during the US election was unreal. I firmly believe that she made huge gains in some states with low voting turnouts, simply by providing information on who can vote, how to register, where to vote, and why. She was relentless on social media during the campaign, and her following was a mix of supporters and trash talkers. She continually maintained composure, up-to-date information, real time valuable voting information, contacts and names of people to call if you need assistance, and the list goes on. She is also an on-the-ground activist for many other causes. I find it fascinating to learn who choses to use their celebrity status for certain causes. She is definitely one who is an activist online, and walks the talk.
Currently, there is a great deal of pressure for companies and businesses to take a stand on issues and participate in social activism. In the article Genuine Social Media Activism: A Guide for Going Beyond the Hashtag , “Nearly two-thirds of consumers believe it’s important for companies to take a stand on social issues. And for many, taking a stand is just the start. Consumers increasingly want companies to act with purpose, and have been rewarding those that do with three times faster growth than their competitors”. In the article How brands that authentically lead with purpose are changing the nature of business today, it states that “the current trend based on our research shows that businesses are using purpose to create deeper connections with consumers, do more for the communities with which they work, attract and retain talent, and in the process, are achieving greater results and impact”.
For my final thoughts, I will focus on educators modeling active online citizenship. This can be tricky because we are held by certain standards and by our Code of Ethics to maintain professionalism at all times. We need to be careful in whom we address, debate with, and what we say. I guess this all depends on what we are advocating for. However, we have young inspiring minds who are with us each day, and youth activism gains strength with every generation of children becoming teenagers and young adults. “Schoolkids today are either a part of Generation Z (Gen Z), born from anywhere from 1997 to the early 2010s, or Generation Alpha (Gen A), which will include children with birth dates from the mid-2010s to the mid-2020s. Both generations have never known a world without the internet, and their early exposure to social media has allowed them to see role models their own age speaking up for important causes”. This excerpt from Educators are inspiring a new generation of social justice warriors, discusses what our future will look like for such a diverse Gen A, and our youth. The dedication to social justice is likely to continue as members of Gen A and younger Gen Z complete their education and reach the workforce, which means they will expect more, and they won’t be afraid to say it. The article is definitely worth a read!
That’s all for now!
Great post! I appreciate the inclusion of this very useful graphic. I will definitely be checking out the last article you shared about creating social Justice warriors. What do you think our role is with this Gen A group? Are we too late to make an impact with Gen Z?
It’s so hard to know how this will play out. The part about Gen A and Gen Z never knowing anything BUT technology really resonated with me. They have to be so careful with their presence online because that’s all they will know, so maybe the way we teach has to change. Perhaps we need a technology curriculum of some sort? Or will it evolve into it’s own ‘thing’?
I agree Lynnette! I worked with a team of people who tried hard to help teachers see how they could implement digital citizenship into their regular teaching practice with cross curricular links across the grade levels. We worked on this initiative for two years and gave teachers absolutely everything they needed to get started. The challenge. . .it is not explicitly in the curriculum and as a result, it is still not being taught as it should be. I really believe that the only chance we have of preparing this generation to be more thoughtful contributors who know when and how to use their voice to make change is to be teaching this!
Wow!! I would love to see what you all worked on. It needs to be shared and utilized – that’s a lot of work and amazing foresight.
Hi Lynnette,
I really enjoyed reading your post and I also implemented the quote about the four roles of social activitism which I found was very helpful and insightful. I was interested when you stated, “…so now I have entered the realm of self-censorship because it isn’t worth it to argue with a complete stranger on social media”. It is very intriguing in this way, because as a result then we create our own echo chamber. So, it is very challenging to advocate and speak up against oppression if it feels like we have to censor ourselves around certain groups of people. How do we find this balance between being a social activist and also trying to accommodate for differing opinions is a tricky song and dance, but definitely one worth trying to strengthen rather than not allowing to be your true self.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. It definitely made me think more deeply about this concept of censorship.
Thanks Chris,
I didn’t quite word it that way, I just don’t feel comfortable debating online. It’s not who I am and I have never been an opinionated person unless I know a lot about the topic. I’m a listener. I’m an empath. I always weigh options and try to see both sides. Now that’s not saying I won’t ever be an online activist. If there is a cause I really believe in I will support and advocate 100%. I agree though, there has to be a balance for everyone, but that balance should look different for each of us because we all lead different lives.
Lynette, your blog looks fantastic! I agree digital citizenship does need to be explicitly taught in schools, starting from a young age. Too often I hear rumblings of adding more to teachers’ already unbalanced plates and when is time going to be made to teach the curriculum let alone things outside of the curriculum. Maybe too it’s because people are uncomfortable with the subject matter, or maybe think that it’s irrelevant. Whatever the case may be, it is being missed in the classrooms. So how do we get there? How do we get more people on board with teaching and learning more about digital citizenship and seeing the many benefits it has over the long term?
Very well said – I feel people are not fully grasping the power of children and technology, and what this means for future generations. It is something utilized 24/7 everywhere in the world, so how can we not place technology and digital citizenship into the forefront? It’s a no brainer.
Dear Lynette, I found your discussion on the four ECI 831 blog questions very interesting. Bill Moyers social activism model is an excellent visual to frame the discussion. Yes in the real world participants acting in all four roles do exist and influence change and status quo both with varying degrees of effectiveness. In my judgement, I think that our education system falls more into the “citizen” quadrant as well as the “reformer’ quadrant both ineffective and effective.
The environment is challenging for those of us who wish to see a more just society unfold through the education system. Great post. Good food for thought!